Re: [PATCH 12/22] delete_ref_loose(): don't muck around in the lock_file's filename
On Tue, Apr 01, 2014 at 05:58:20PM +0200, Michael Haggerty wrote:
> It's bad manners. Especially since, if unlink_or_warn() failed, the
> memory wasn't restored to its original contents.
>
> So make our own copy to work with.
Show 15 quoted lines
> if (!(flag & REF_ISPACKED) || flag & REF_ISSYMREF) {
> - /* loose */
> - int err, i = strlen(lock->lk->filename) - 5; /* .lock */
> -
> - lock->lk->filename[i] = 0;
> - err = unlink_or_warn(lock->lk->filename);
> - lock->lk->filename[i] = '.';
> + /*
> + * loose. The loose file name is the same as the
> + * lockfile name, minus ".lock":
> + */
> + char *loose_filename = xmemdupz(lock->lk->filename,
> + strlen(lock->lk->filename) - 5);
> + int err = unlink_or_warn(loose_filename);
> + free(loose_filename);Should we be using LOCK_SUFFIX_LEN from the previous commit here?
-Peff