Re: [PATCH 11/13] strbuf: add strbuf_add*_urlencode
- From
Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
- Date
- Nov 30, 2011, 03:20 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20111130032028.GA24704@sigill.intra.peff.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <4ED56A1C.9050800@lsrfire.ath.cx>
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 12:26:20AM +0100, René Scharfe wrote:
Show 12 quoted lines
> >>> +static int is_rfc3986_reserved(char ch)
> >>> +{
> >>> + switch (ch) {
> >>> + case '!': case '*': case '\'': case '(': case ')': case ';':
> >>> + case ':': case '@': case '&': case '=': case '+': case '$':
> >>> + case ',': case '/': case '?': case '#': case '[': case ']':
> >>> + return 1;
> >>> + }
> [...]
> Sorry for my bikeshedding, but I'd paint it like this:
>
> return !!strchr("!*'();:@&=+$,/?#[]", ch);I was always under the impression that computed jumps via "switch" would out-perform even an optimized strchr. Of course, I never tested. And I doubt performance is even relevant here, and I admit I don't care overly much. I find them both equally readable.
I'm going to leave it as-is unless somebody else wants to say "I strongly prefer version X".
-Peff