Re: [PATCH 0/6] A handful of "branch description" patches
- From
Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
- Date
- Sep 23, 2011, 20:53 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20110923205319.GA28802@sigill.intra.peff.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <7vk48zt211.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 01:52:10PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 6 quoted lines
> A more fundamental issue I have with this is that names of the refs are > local by nature (what I call "master" branch is not "master" to you, but > rather it is "origin/master" or "jch/master") while notes is meant to be > the mechanism to share. The following shares the same issue, but at least > it does not abuse "notes", so in that sense it may be cleaner at the > design level...
Good point. For that reason, your config-based solution perhaps makes more sense.
-Peff