From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2011 20:53:19 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] A handful of "branch description" patches
Message-ID: <20110923205319.GA28802@sigill.intra.peff.net>
In-Reply-To: <7vk48zt211.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>

On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 01:52:10PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> A more fundamental issue I have with this is that names of the refs are
> local by nature (what I call "master" branch is not "master" to you, but
> rather it is "origin/master" or "jch/master") while notes is meant to be
> the mechanism to share. The following shares the same issue, but at least
> it does not abuse "notes", so in that sense it may be cleaner at the
> design level...

Good point. For that reason, your config-based solution perhaps makes
more sense.

-Peff