Re: Fwd: [Survey] Signed push
- From
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
- Date
- Sep 14, 2011, 18:36 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CA+55aFyUxmPWdG1j-0t9h9g9=1MmLt7w8fdmz+dZjS=1aDgWiA@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <7vk49bui4f.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 10:52 AM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
Show 7 quoted lines
> Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> writes: > >> Now people do "git merge" in scripts etc, so we can't fix it ;-( > > Yes you can, by teaching "git merge -e" to open an editor ;-). > > In the meantime, "commit --amend" is your friend.
The problem with both of those are human: because it's extra work, it's not going to get done.
In contrast, if it's extra work to *avoid* editing the merge message, people probably would see the editor pop up, and start adding a few small notes.
That's why "default behavior" matters so much. It's not that it's not *possible* to edit a merge message, it's that nobody ever does!
Linus