Re: Fwd: [Survey] Signed push
- From
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
- Date
- Sep 14, 2011, 15:27 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CA+55aFyGRM132OzoJR7wZ8wETvxrFWSmSMjMJnVOKP+6vys-Sw@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <vpqfwjzxu6i.fsf@bauges.imag.fr>
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 4:03 AM, Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@grenoble-inp.fr> wrote:
> > Would the notes mechanism be able to annotate ref names instead of > commit sha1?
That would be a horrible, horrible notion.
It's quite common to have multiple branches with the same SHA1. It might be in the "experimental-development" branch, but it got through testing with flying colors and deemed to be stable, so it got upgraded to the "for-linus" branch, and there hasn't been any other development since. So now both "for-linus" and "experimental-development" are the same commit, but they are very much not the same branch!
So no, don't confuse branch *contents* with branch *descriptions*.
Linus