Re: Command-line interface thoughts
- From
Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>
- Date
- Jun 9, 2011, 13:06 UTC
- Message-ID
- <201106091506.31511.jnareb@gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <201106091445.55601.jnareb@gmail.com>
Jakub Narebski wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 9, 2011, Michael Nahas wrote: >> On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 5:48 AM, Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Wed, 8 June 2011, Michael Nahas wrote:
[...]
Show 16 quoted lines
>>>> "git diff HEAD NEXT" would print the resolved changes.
>>>> "git diff NEXT WTREE" would print the unresolved changes
>>>> "git diff HEAD WTREE" would print all changes.
>>>>
>>>> I believe that is the same behaviour as "git diff", "git diff
>>>> --cached" and "git diff HEAD" during a conflicted merge.
>>>
>>> "git diff NEXT WTREE" would not behave (with your proposal) like
>>> "git diff", but like "git diff --ours".
>>
>> OURS and HEAD are the same thing, so I doubt a command that does not
>> involve "HEAD" would behave like "--ours"
>
> OURS and HEAD are not the same thing. In OURS you have _conflicted_
> chunks replaced with HEAD ('ours') version, but chunks that can be
> resolved sutomatically are resolved; sometimes to 'theirs' version.I'm very sorry, my mistake. I have actually checked and OURS is the same as HEAD version.
You wrote that NEXT contains either stage 0 for resolved files, or OURS (HEAD) version for files with conflicts. But that is exactly what "git diff --ours" show.
Show 8 quoted lines
> "git diff" in case of conflict prints 3-way combined diff between > 'ours', 'theirs' and working area version. As "git diff NEXT WTREE" > doesn't print 3-way combined diff, it would be different for conflicts > from "git diff". > > "git diff --ours" for nonconflicted entry (stage 0 in index) would > print ordinary diff between index and working area, just like > "git diff NEXT WTREE". [...]
-- Jakub Narebski Poland