Re: Command-line interface thoughts (ad-hominem attacks)
- From
Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
- Date
- Jun 8, 2011, 15:05 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20110608150537.GC7805@sigill.intra.peff.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <BANLkTinoQCZhyhgw61u7c3eF4e5MEf+eFA@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 07:39:16AM -0400, Michael Nahas wrote:
Show 8 quoted lines
> On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 7:12 AM, Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com> wrote: > > I don't quite think that we need "git diff NEXT WTREE"; the short > > and sweet "git diff" is short for a reason, > > To be clear, I'm not advocating and have never advocated getting rid > of zero-argument "git diff". I've advocated that every (whole > project) diff command should be expressible by a "git diff TREE1 > TREE2". I'm fine with defaults if one or zero trees are specified.
I agree with this, but...
> So "git diff" would default to "git diff NEXT WTREE".
Isn't this going to be behavior change, since your NEXT is not quite the same as the index? How do I now get an n-way combined diff of the unmerged files in the index?
-Peff