[RFC/PATCH 0/2] unpack-trees: handle lstat failures in verify_absent
- From
Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
- Date
- Jan 13, 2011, 02:24 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20110113022415.GA8635@burratino>
- In-Reply-To
- <1230843273-11056-2-git-send-email-drizzd@aon.at>
Here are two cases where we ignore the result from lstat in unpack_trees. I think we rather shouldn't ignore it. Sane?
Jonathan Nieder (2): unpack-trees: handle lstat failure for existing directory unpack-trees: handle lstat failure for existing file
unpack-trees.c | 8 ++++++-- 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)