From: Jonathan Nieder Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2011 02:24:15 GMT Subject: [RFC/PATCH 0/2] unpack-trees: handle lstat failures in verify_absent Message-ID: <20110113022415.GA8635@burratino> In-Reply-To: <1230843273-11056-2-git-send-email-drizzd@aon.at> Here are two cases where we ignore the result from lstat in unpack_trees. I think we rather shouldn't ignore it. Sane? Jonathan Nieder (2): unpack-trees: handle lstat failure for existing directory unpack-trees: handle lstat failure for existing file unpack-trees.c | 8 ++++++-- 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)