Re: [PATCHv3] filter-branch: Add tests for submodules
- From
Michal Sojka <sojkam1@fel.cvut.cz>
- Date
- Jan 28, 2010, 09:02 UTC
- Message-ID
- <201001281002.03232.sojkam1@fel.cvut.cz>
- In-Reply-To
- <7vfx5rnl0w.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
On Thursday 28 of January 2010 01:14:07 Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 9 quoted lines
> Michal Sojka <sojkam1@fel.cvut.cz> writes: > > There are three important tests: > > It is unnecessary and counterproductive to self-proclaim the importance of > a patch or new tests. If anything, what are important are not tests > themselves but the conditions that they check, so "Add tests to check > three important cases:" is slightly more palatable. > > I'd suggest to just start with "Add three tests to make sure:".
OK
Show 5 quoted lines
> > 1) 'rewrite submodule with another content' passes only with the > > previous patch applied. > > Sorry, but I think I am missing some context here to understand this > sentence. Which previous patch?
I should have sent both patches. Sorry for that. I'll send them now.
Show 9 quoted lines
> > 2) 'checkout submodule during rewrite' demonstrates that it is not > > possible to replace a submodule revision in tree-filter by checking > > the submodule out and reseting the submodule's HEAD. Fails both > > with and without the previous patch. This is because filter-branch > > sets GIT_WORKING_TREE to "." which causes clone (called from > > git-submodule) to fail. > > I thought you agreed with Hannes that this is not something we would even > want to support?
Yes. I'm removing this test.
Cheers, Michal