Re: git notes: notes

From: Joey Hess <joey@kitenet.net>
Date: Jan 20, 2010, 20:36 UTC
Message-ID: <20100120203636.GA9221@gnu.kitenet.net>
In-Reply-To: <7vska01qrt.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>

Junio C Hamano wrote:

Show 10 quoted lines

> Joey Hess <joey@kitenet.net> writes:
> 
> > Do you think it makes sense for even git log --format=format:%s to be
> > porcelain and potentially change when new features are used?
> 
> If the series changed the meaning of "%s" format to mean "the subject of
> the commit and notes information", with or without documenting it, then it
> is just a bug we would like to fix.
> 
> But I cannot reproduce such a bug.  In my tree locally:

I was asking hypothetically, trying to point out that parts of git log seem to make sense to be used as plumbing, with the hope I can continue to use it that way.

(Note that git instaweb parses output of git log --pretty=format:%H --raw like it's plumbing.)

-- 
see shy jo