Re: [StGit PATCH v2 0/6] add support for git send-email
- From
- Alex Chiang <achiang@hp.com>
- Date
- Dec 3, 2009, 19:27 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20091203192731.GD23258@ldl.fc.hp.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <b8197bcb0912012246n3b83866cjb93654effc000242@mail.gmail.com>
* Karl Wiberg <kha@treskal.com>:
Show 12 quoted lines
> On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 1:46 AM, Alex Chiang <achiang@hp.com> wrote: > > The upshot is that in stg mail, --git and --mbox don't interact > > well, and the resulting mbox file will lack the recipients. This > > might be fixed in the future if we teach git send-email how to > > generate mbox files, but then we introduce a versioning problem. > > One wild idea: git send-email's --smtp-server flag will accept the > (full) path of a sendmail program; writing such a program, just > capable enough to receive the outgoing emails and dumping them to a > file, should be easy. Another option would be a program that speaks > just enough SMTP to accept the mails. (Incidentally, these two would > be useful in testing stg mail even without the --git option.)
Hm, I think this is getting to be a bit of overkill. I could see adding --mbox support to git send-email as being a better use of time (IMO).
> I fully understand if you'd rather get on with scratching your actual > itch, though ...
:)
> > So let's just accept this wart for now, and say, if you want an mbox > > file generated, don't use --git. That seems reasonable to me. > > Sure.
Thanks, /ac