Re: [PATCH/RFC] builtin-checkout: suggest creating local branch when appropriate to do so
- From
Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
- Date
- Oct 14, 2009, 04:31 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20091014043150.GB28795@coredump.intra.peff.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <alpine.DEB.1.00.0910140117280.4985@pacific.mpi-cbg.de>
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 01:22:26AM +0200, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> At some point, trying to educate the user is not helpful but annoying. If > Git already knows what I want, why does it not do it already? _That_ is > the question I already hear in my ears.
I am not entirely convinced that the suggested behaviors will result in that user response, or a different one (like "why does git keep giving me bad advice?"). Which is why I suggested data collection.
Show 6 quoted lines
> > So doing step (1) would be a way of collecting some of that data (will > > users say "stupid git, if you knew what I wanted, why didn't you just do > > it?" or "stupid git, your suggestion is just confusing me!"). > > I disagree. It is not about collecting data. We will not get any > feedback from the affected people. You know that, I know that.
I don't agree. You are already talking about users complaining about git's interface. Isn't that feedback? How do you hear those complaints now?
I don't think they will come on the list and talk about it, but if we release a version of git that has differing behavior and give it some time to be used in the wild, we _will_ get feedback in the form of blogs, complaints on other lists, word-of-mouth, etc.
Now maybe that is not a good idea in this instance, because that sort of feedback may take several versions to appear, and we are talking about a potential timetable of v1.7.0, which is probalby only two versions away.
-Peff