Re: [PATCH v2] Fix buffer overflow in config parser
- From
Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
- Date
- Apr 15, 2009, 07:53 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20090415075352.GB23332@coredump.intra.peff.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <20090415075035.GA23332@coredump.intra.peff.net>
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 03:50:35AM -0400, Jeff King wrote:
Show 5 quoted lines
> 2. Tests which happen to require perl as part of the testing. > [...] > Your usage falls into (2), none of which are marked (and if they are to > be marked, then all of them should be, since there is otherwise no > point).
I meant to add: it is still nice to avoid the use of perl in the test scripts if we can (and I think we can in this instance, as other responses have noted). If a patch were made to skip tests which use perl, then the fewer tests we have to skip, the better.
-Peff