From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 07:53:52 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Fix buffer overflow in config parser
Message-ID: <20090415075352.GB23332@coredump.intra.peff.net>
In-Reply-To: <20090415075035.GA23332@coredump.intra.peff.net>

On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 03:50:35AM -0400, Jeff King wrote:

>   2. Tests which happen to require perl as part of the testing.
> [...]
> Your usage falls into (2), none of which are marked (and if they are to
> be marked, then all of them should be, since there is otherwise no
> point).

I meant to add: it is still nice to avoid the use of perl in the test
scripts if we can (and I think we can in this instance, as other
responses have noted). If a patch were made to skip tests which use
perl, then the fewer tests we have to skip, the better.

-Peff