Re: [RFC - draft] List of proposed future changes that are backward incompatible

> Björn Steinbrink <B.Steinbrink@gmx.de> writes:
> 
> > How about having the default in the code being a warning, but the
> > default for new repos being "reject"?
> 
> To reserve time to manage git itself, I will try not to point people to
> previous discussions, but I'd like help from people who've already seen
> the previous discussions to do so.  This is one of the things that was
> proposed and already shot down.