Re: send-email sending shallow threads by default

From: SZEDER Gábor <szeder@ira.uka.de>
Date: Feb 16, 2009, 07:55 UTC
Message-ID: <20090216075534.GA11838@neumann>
In-Reply-To: <20090216000732.GC3503@coredump.intra.peff.net>

Hi,

On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 07:07:32PM -0500, Jeff King wrote:

Show 11 quoted lines

> On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 03:53:50PM -0800, david@lang.hm wrote:
> > I have mixed feelings about this one, if some messages get delayed in  
> > transit the deep threads still keeps them in order, while the 2-layer  
> > option doesn't.
> 
> Is that the case? mutt at least orders by thread, but by rfc822 date
> within a single level of thread. So as long as the date fields (set by
> the sender) are correct, it looks right no matter what order they arrive
> in.
> 
> Are there common readers that thread but do not order by date?

Gmane.

(e.g. http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/110068)

Regards, Gábor

$ cat FOOTERMessages come from the public archive at lore.kernel.org/git, fetched every hour. The front page is chosen and written each morning by an AI editor and can be wrong; the threads themselves are the record. About and API. For agents: an MCP server at https://gitlist.dev/mcp, and any thread, story or person page as Markdown by adding .md to its URL (or sending Accept: text/markdown). Details in /llms.txt.