Re: [PATCH 1/2] add '%d' pretty format specifier to show decoration
- From
Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
- Date
- Sep 3, 2008, 21:04 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20080903210418.GB32413@coredump.intra.peff.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <7vsksh9c9m.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org>
On Wed, Sep 03, 2008 at 01:59:17PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 5 quoted lines
> > Isn't that what you argued against in Dscho's version of the patch? > > > > http://mid.gmane.org/7v1w5exfwb.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org > > Yeah, but unlike Linus, I am not infallible. Also, I can change my mind.
Heh. OK, I am not against you changing your mind, but I like to at least see "...and here is what is different." So thank you.
I think adding the space to the parentheses makes the most sense. Without more advanced syntax, we have to make a choice between doing too much (e.g., adding parentheses when the user doesn't want it) and too little (the user has to put in parentheses manually, which means they are there whether there is decoration or not). Doing parentheses _without_ the space means we fail at both. So let us at least get it half right. ;)
-Peff