Re: [PATCH 6/6] Add a new test for using a custom merge strategy
- From
Miklos Vajna <vmiklos@frugalware.org>
- Date
- Jul 28, 2008, 23:58 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20080728235847.GR32057@genesis.frugalware.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <alpine.DEB.1.00.0807290153300.2725@eeepc-johanness>
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 01:54:17AM +0200, Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> wrote:
> Actually, this _is_ the opposite of -s ours, no? -s ours just takes our > tree, your -s theirs just takes their tree. > > Sorry for the confusion I caused,
Aah. :-)
I did not read the source of git-merge-ours and based on your description I thought my knowledge / the doc about -s ours was not correct.
So I guess my original patch was right, then.
Note to self: "take 2" gets messy, time to send a "take 3" soon. ;-)