Re: [PATCH] builtin-tag: fix fallouts from recent parsopt restriction.

From: Pierre Habouzit <madcoder@debian.org>
Date: Dec 17, 2007, 23:14 UTC
Message-ID: <20071217231459.GA4422@artemis.madism.org>
In-Reply-To: <20071217230729.GE2105@coredump.intra.peff.net>

On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 11:07:29PM +0000, Jeff King wrote:

Show 7 quoted lines

> On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 10:01:16PM +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> 
> >   Err I misread your point, _yes_ we do, see builtin-show-ref.c, or see
> > --start-number in builtin-log.c. There is a precedent.
> 
> Ugh. Well, in that case, it seems we are stuck with it, and I think
> the behavior Junio laid out is the right course of action.

Well I agree, I was mostly trying to show what the code could look like if we tried to be more clever. I'm fine for enforcing the sticked usage for optional flags, I was the one advocating it in the first place anyways. I just wanted to be sure we didn't missed something obvious.

-- 
·O·  Pierre Habouzit
··O                                                madcoder@debian.org
OOO                                                http://www.madism.org