Re: [RFH] convert shortlog to use parse_options
On ven, déc 14, 2007 at 08:34:58 +0000, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 9 quoted lines
> Pierre Habouzit <madcoder@debian.org> writes:
>
> > On Fri, Dec 14, 2007 at 05:59:52AM +0000, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> >> git cmd --abbrev=10 -n=4
> >
> > actually -n=4 isn't understood atm, only -n4 and -n 4 are.
>
> Ah, my mistake. And I do not think accepting -n=4 is a good idea (it is
> not historically done).
Show 8 quoted lines
> After thinking about it a bit more, I think I was worried too much about
> burdening the users to remember the differences between options with,
> without and optional option-arguments [*1*]. They need to know the
> difference between options with and without option-arguments already
> because single letter options can be combined if they are without
> option-arguments, and they have to write "shortlog -new72" but not
> "shortlog -wen72". If they want to be extra sure, they can be more
> explicit and say "shortlog -n -e -w72".
Yep, let's do it then. Note that's the reason why I felt we need a
manual page about this, because we should give some guidelines of what
is safe for scripting.
--
·O· Pierre Habouzit
··O madcoder@debian.org
OOO http://www.madism.org
Pierre Habouzit <madcoder@debian.org>