From: Jan Hudec Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 20:12:47 GMT Subject: Re: Git User's Survey 2007 summary - git homepage improvements Message-ID: <20071016201247.GH26127@efreet.light.src> In-Reply-To: <20071014225618.GH31659@planck.djpig.de> On Mon, Oct 15, 2007 at 00:56:18 +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > On Mon, Oct 15, 2007 at 12:05:22AM +0200, Jakub Narebski wrote: > > Generic: > > # Dedicated domain name / site name, e.g. git.org or git.com > > to have it look less like mirror or unofficial page > > > > (git.or.cz still comes first when searching Google for "git"; > > current domain name was available to homepage admin - historical > > reason) > > Hmm, I guess most names that would qualify are already taken > (most of them by squatters, though). So someone > would have to pay money for this... > (And I guess something like git-scm.org wouldn't qualify as more > "official", would it?) It certainly would. It would be 2nd level domain, not a 3rd level one. Note, that none of the other vcs' have a homepage at theirname.org -- subversion is svn.tigris.org, bazaar is bazaaz-vcs.org, mercurial is www.selenic.com/mercurial, svk is svk.bestpractical.com, monotone is monotone.ca. So git-vcs.org would be quite good. -- Jan 'Bulb' Hudec