From: Frank Lichtenheld <frank@lichtenheld.de>
Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2007 22:56:18 GMT
Subject: Re: Git User's Survey 2007 summary - git homepage improvements
Message-ID: <20071014225618.GH31659@planck.djpig.de>
In-Reply-To: <8fe92b430710141505y75ab61c4l50688fc9530e4f90@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Oct 15, 2007 at 12:05:22AM +0200, Jakub Narebski wrote:
> Generic:
>  # Dedicated domain name / site name, e.g. git.org or git.com
>    to have it look less like mirror or unofficial page
> 
>    (git.or.cz still comes first when searching Google for "git";
>    current domain name was available to homepage admin - historical
>    reason)

Hmm, I guess most names that would qualify are already taken
(most of them by squatters, though). So someone
would have to pay money for this...
(And I guess something like git-scm.org wouldn't qualify as more
"official", would it?)

However, I have to admit I had quite some problems remembering the
domain name myself in the beginning...

> Downloads:
>  # More up-to-date about new git versions.
> 
>    (With one person updating homepage, who is not git maintainer...)

There are use-cases for shared repositories. Maybe this is one of them?

Gruesse,
-- 
Frank Lichtenheld <frank@lichtenheld.de>
www: http://www.djpig.de/