Re: Merging commits together into a super-commit
- From
- J. Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org>
- Date
- May 10, 2007, 19:51 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20070510195152.GS13719@fieldses.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <20070510194742.GC4489@pasky.or.cz>
On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 09:47:42PM +0200, Petr Baudis wrote:
> Actually, you don't have to - if you don't specify the patch names, > stgit will make them up itself using the subject of the commit message > as a base.
You still have to on new patches, right?
> And by the way, I absolutely love that - when viewing the stack, it's > very useful to see what commits you still have to go etc. - stg series > is concise yet fully descriptive.
Sure.
I mainly find myself using gitk origin.. for that now. My main problem there is just that it's slow. (And File->Update) seems possibly even slower than just killing and restarting it.--b.