From: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org>
Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 19:51:52 GMT
Subject: Re: Merging commits together into a super-commit
Message-ID: <20070510195152.GS13719@fieldses.org>
In-Reply-To: <20070510194742.GC4489@pasky.or.cz>

On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 09:47:42PM +0200, Petr Baudis wrote:
> Actually, you don't have to - if you don't specify the patch names,
> stgit will make them up itself using the subject of the commit message
> as a base.

You still have to on new patches, right?

> And by the way, I absolutely love that - when viewing the stack, it's
> very useful to see what commits you still have to go etc. - stg series
> is concise yet fully descriptive.

Sure.

I mainly find myself using gitk origin.. for that now.  My main problem
there is just that it's slow.  (And File->Update) seems possibly even
slower than just killing and restarting it.--b.