Re: Merging commits together into a super-commit
- From
Karl Hasselström <kha@treskal.com>
- Date
- May 13, 2007, 18:43 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20070513184327.GA14078@diana.vm.bytemark.co.uk>
- In-Reply-To
- <7vy7jtyh8q.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
On 2007-05-12 12:27:49 -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 11 quoted lines
> Yann Dirson <ydirson@altern.org> writes: > > > This supposes there is no valuable branch-level metadata. > > Currently we have the description - something which could arguably > > be moved to the git level as well. Otherwise that sounds > > reasonable to me. > > Will it be something like > > [branch "master"] > description = "My primary development line"
Yes, exactly. It's just a simple per-branch description string, just like in your suggestion.
> if so I think that is a reasonable thing to do, from git-core's > point of view. Obviously, gitk, tig, gitweb and friends can use > this, too.
Absolutely.
> Are there other per-branch information StGIT wants to keep on an > active branch that might benefit the core as well?
No, I'm pretty sure there isn't.
--
Karl Hasselström, kha@treskal.com
www.treskal.com/kalle