Re: Merging commits together into a super-commit

From: Karl Hasselström <kha@treskal.com>
Date: May 12, 2007, 17:03 UTC
Message-ID: <20070512170304.GC28039@diana.vm.bytemark.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <20070512144145.GF16903@nan92-1-81-57-214-146.fbx.proxad.net>

On 2007-05-12 16:41:45 +0200, Yann Dirson wrote:

Show 8 quoted lines

> On Sat, May 12, 2007 at 04:02:28PM +0200, Karl Hasselström wrote:
>
> > What we should do is delete all stgit metadata when the last patch
> > goes away.
>
> This supposes there is no valuable branch-level metadata. Currently
> we have the description - something which could arguably be moved to
> the git level as well. Otherwise that sounds reasonable to me.

I left the branch description out of the discussion on purpose, since it's not that interesting -- if there is a description, we can simply delete everything except that. And I wholeheartedly agree that the branch description doesn't belong in stgit; it's orthogonal to the business of managing a patch stack.

Show 5 quoted lines

> > And we shouldn't have "stg init", either. Initing should be done
> > automatically when needed.
>
> Good idea as well, that would make stg more accessible to the
> average plain-git user.

Yes, that's my secret evil master plan.

-- 
Karl Hasselström, kha@treskal.com
      www.treskal.com/kalle