git/list[1] front-page[2] threads[3] people[4] search[5] about
 

Re: [RFC] Submodules in GIT

From
APAndy Parkins <andyparkins@gmail.com>
Date
Dec 1, 2006, 10:38 UTC
Message-ID
<200612011038.29193.andyparkins@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To
<456FF6D1.4040500@op5.se>
On Friday 2006 December 01 09:33, Andreas Ericsson wrote:
> True, but this makes one repo of the submodule special. Let's say you
> have this layout
In a way, but it's information that doesn't need to be transmitted.
Show 9 quoted lines
> mozilla/.git
> mozilla/openssl/.git
> mozilla/xlat/.git
>
> Now, we can be reasonably sure that the 'xlat' repo is something the
> mozilla core team can push to, or at least we can consider the core repo
> owners an official "vendor" of tags for the submodule repo. I'm fairly
> certain openssl authors won't be too happy with allowing the thousands
> of projects using its code to push tags to its official repo though.

No need, when cloning a supermodule, it will make those special tags automatically in the submodule repo. They are only there to prevent prune from destroying those referenced commits after all. If the submodule is cloned directly, they aren't needed anyway, and those objects won't be part of the dependency chain so wouldn't be downloaded.

Show 6 quoted lines
> Now that I think about it more, I realize this is completely irrelevant
> as the ui can create the tags in the submodule with info only from the
> the supermodule, which means the submodule repo will only be special if
> it's connected to the supermodule. We just need a command for creating
> those tags in the submodule repo so people who use the same submodule
> code for several projects can use the alternates mechanism effectively.

Is that even necessary? git-clone of a supermodule will make those tags automatically. If a submodule was alternative-cloned into a different supermodule, well then THAT supermodule would make the right tags for itself. Ah, I think I see what you mean now though, a method would be needed for creating those tags if we managed to manually get a submodule repository in to the supermodule - then supermodule-clone wouldn't have run. Perhaps they could be checked for at commit time and recreated then?

Andy
-- 
Dr Andy Parkins, M Eng (hons), MIEE
Previous: Andreas Ericsson
Message 82 of 82 in “Re: [RFC] Submodules in GIT”
  1. Jakub NarebskiNov 20, 2006
  2. Martin WaitzNov 20, 2006
  3. Junio C HamanoNov 20, 2006
  4. Jakub NarebskiNov 20, 2006
  5. Martin WaitzNov 20, 2006
  6. Sam VilainNov 21, 2006
  7. Linus TorvaldsNov 20, 2006
  8. J. Bruce FieldsNov 20, 2006
  9. Martin WaitzNov 20, 2006
  10. J. Bruce FieldsNov 21, 2006
  11. Martin WaitzNov 21, 2006
  12. Martin WaitzNov 20, 2006
  13. Junio C HamanoNov 21, 2006
  14. Jakub NarebskiNov 21, 2006
  15. Martin WaitzNov 21, 2006
  16. Jakub NarebskiNov 21, 2006
  17. Martin WaitzNov 21, 2006
  18. Martin WaitzNov 21, 2006
  19. Junio C HamanoNov 21, 2006
  20. Martin WaitzNov 21, 2006
  21. Yann DirsonNov 21, 2006
  22. Linus TorvaldsNov 21, 2006
  23. Linus TorvaldsNov 21, 2006
  24. Yann DirsonNov 21, 2006
  25. Shawn PearceNov 22, 2006
  26. Yann DirsonNov 23, 2006
  27. Shawn PearceNov 25, 2006
  28. Yann DirsonNov 25, 2006
  29. Linus TorvaldsNov 25, 2006
  30. Steven GrimmNov 25, 2006
  31. Linus TorvaldsNov 25, 2006
  32. Yann DirsonNov 25, 2006
  33. Sven VerdoolaegeNov 26, 2006
  34. Yann DirsonNov 26, 2006
  35. Linus TorvaldsNov 26, 2006
  36. Daniel BarkalowNov 26, 2006
  37. Andreas EricssonNov 28, 2006
  38. Daniel BarkalowNov 28, 2006
  39. Sven VerdoolaegeNov 28, 2006
  40. Daniel BarkalowNov 28, 2006
  41. Sven VerdoolaegeNov 28, 2006
  42. Daniel BarkalowNov 28, 2006
  43. Shawn PearceNov 28, 2006
  44. Daniel BarkalowNov 28, 2006
  45. Linus TorvaldsNov 28, 2006
  46. Stephan FederNov 30, 2006
  47. Andy ParkinsNov 30, 2006
  48. Sven VerdoolaegeNov 30, 2006
  49. Andy ParkinsNov 30, 2006
  50. Andreas EricssonNov 30, 2006
  51. Andy ParkinsNov 30, 2006
  52. Sven VerdoolaegeNov 30, 2006
  53. Andy ParkinsDec 1, 2006
  54. Jakub NarebskiDec 1, 2006
  55. Sven VerdoolaegeDec 1, 2006
  56. Andy ParkinsDec 1, 2006
  57. Martin WaitzNov 30, 2006
  58. sfNov 30, 2006
  59. sfNov 30, 2006
  60. Andy ParkinsDec 1, 2006
  61. Martin WaitzDec 1, 2006
  62. Andy ParkinsDec 1, 2006
  63. Sven VerdoolaegeDec 1, 2006
  64. Andy ParkinsDec 1, 2006
  65. Sven VerdoolaegeDec 1, 2006
  66. sfDec 1, 2006
  67. Andy ParkinsDec 1, 2006
  68. Martin WaitzDec 1, 2006
  69. Andy ParkinsDec 1, 2006
  70. Martin WaitzDec 1, 2006
  71. Martin WaitzDec 1, 2006
  72. Andy ParkinsDec 1, 2006
  73. Martin WaitzDec 1, 2006
  74. Andy ParkinsDec 1, 2006
  75. Martin WaitzDec 1, 2006
  76. Martin WaitzDec 1, 2006
  77. Andy ParkinsDec 1, 2006
  78. Martin WaitzDec 1, 2006
  79. Jakub NarebskiDec 2, 2006
  80. Andy ParkinsDec 1, 2006
  81. Andreas EricssonDec 1, 2006
  82. Andy ParkinsDec 1, 2006

Read the whole thread, see it on lore, or plain text.

$ cat FOOTERMessages come from the public archive at lore.kernel.org/git, fetched every hour. The front page is chosen and written each morning by an AI editor and can be wrong; the threads themselves are the record. About and API. For agents: an MCP server at https://gitlist.dev/mcp, and any thread, story or person page as Markdown by adding .md to its URL (or sending Accept: text/markdown). Details in /llms.txt.