Re: Unresolved issues #2 (shallow clone again)
- From
Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu>
- Date
- May 8, 2006, 02:24 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20060508022432.GA26076@thunk.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <Pine.LNX.4.64.0605071853290.3718@g5.osdl.org>
On Sun, May 07, 2006 at 07:04:48PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> Is that without compression?
Yes, without compression. So yes, that probably explains the difference between your numbers and mine.
That brings up an interesting question though --- why not skip compressing files that are under 4k (or whatever the filesystem blocksize happens to be) if they are unpacked? It burns CPU time; maybe not enough to be human-noticeable, but it's still not buying you anything.
- Ted