Re: [PATCH] refs: document transaction semantics
- From
David Turner <dturner@twopensource.com>
- Date
- Feb 25, 2016, 20:50 UTC
- Message-ID
- <1456433438.18017.53.camel@twopensource.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <xmqqvb5cmsup.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>
On Thu, 2016-02-25 at 12:34 -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 8 quoted lines
> David Turner <dturner@twopensource.com> writes: > > > I thought it would be better in the api docs, since it's a design > > decision that all backends should follow. > > Makes sense; as this describes an already available API, it > shouldn't have to wait for the remainder of your series and can just > go to 'master' (or even to 'maint' if we wanted to), right?
Yes.