From: David Turner Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2016 20:50:38 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH] refs: document transaction semantics Message-ID: <1456433438.18017.53.camel@twopensource.com> In-Reply-To: On Thu, 2016-02-25 at 12:34 -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: > David Turner writes: > > > I thought it would be better in the api docs, since it's a design > > decision that all backends should follow. > > Makes sense; as this describes an already available API, it > shouldn't have to wait for the remainder of your series and can just > go to 'master' (or even to 'maint' if we wanted to), right? Yes.