Re: [PATCH 13/14] revert: Introduce --continue to continue the operation
- From
Drew Northup <drew.northup@maine.edu>
- Date
- Jul 6, 2011, 21:52 UTC
- Message-ID
- <1309989158.13231.7.camel@drew-northup.unet.maine.edu>
- In-Reply-To
- <7vliwbjebk.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
On Wed, 2011-07-06 at 14:21 -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> > +static void verify_opt_mutually_compatible(const char *me, ...)
> > +{
>
> Isn't "being compatible" by definition "mutual"? As a strict matter of language, no. And example we see far too often @work is that MS Office 2010 is compatible with MS Office 2007, but the same cannot be said the other way around. (Now if I can convince them that not everyone in the world has MS Office...)
> > I.e. verify-option-compatibility perhaps?
+1 sensible, if that's the intention.
-- -Drew Northup ________________________________________________ "As opposed to vegetable or mineral error?" -John Pescatore, SANS NewsBites Vol. 12 Num. 59