Re: kernel.org now has gitweb installed
- From
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
- Date
- Apr 28, 2005, 21:23 UTC
- Message-ID
- <1114723402.2734.11.camel@localhost.localdomain>
- In-Reply-To
- <7v1x8u7g26.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
On Thu, 2005-04-28 at 14:21 -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 5 quoted lines
> 2. Assuming that we do want to enforce that parent fields of a > commit object name valid commit objects, is it OK to also > require that the commit timestamp of a child object is not in > the future relative to any and all of its parent commit > objects
No. Time is utterly meaningless -- it's perfectly normal for clocks to be out of sync. We really don't want to fall into the trap of assigning any meaning to the timestamp.
-- dwmw2