Re: kernel.org now has gitweb installed

From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Date: Apr 28, 2005, 08:29 UTC
Message-ID: <1114676955.12012.346.camel@baythorne.infradead.org>
In-Reply-To: <20050428081005.GG8612@pasky.ji.cz>

On Thu, 2005-04-28 at 10:10 +0200, Petr Baudis wrote:

Show 14 quoted lines

>   Linus                     ASM (Anonymous Subsystem Maintainer)
> 
>     |------------------------.
>    A|                        |B
>     |                        |
>     |                        \-------------\
>     |                        :             |
>     \------------------------\             |E
>    C|                        |D            |
>     |                        /-------------/
>     |                        |F
>     /------------------------/
> 
> How would you show that? F E D C B A? F D C A E B?

Let us assume that C and A were already in Linus' tree (and on our web page) yesterday. Thus, they should be last. The newly-pulled stuff should be first -- FEDBCA.

I'd say "depth-first, remote parent first" but that would actually show show 'A' (as a parent of D) long before it shows C. Walking of remote parents should stop as soon as we hit a commit which was accessible through a more local parent, rather than as soon as we hit a commit which we've already printed. Maybe it should be something like depth- first, local parent first, but _reversed_?

The latter is what the mailing list feeder does, but that has the advantage of being about to use 'rev-tree $today ^$yesterday' so we _know_ we're excluding the ones people have already seen. Hence I haven't really paid that much attention to getting the order strictly correct.

(Yes, I know that strictly speaking, git has no concept of 'remote' or 'local' parents. But the ordering of the two parents in a Cogito merge or pull hasn't changed, has it?)

-- 
dwmw2