RE: [PATCH] Makefile: build libgit-rs and libgit-sys serially

>On Tue, Aug 26, 2025 at 10:53 AM <rsbecker@nexbridge.com> wrote:
>>
>> On August 26, 2025 1:45 PM, Kyle Lippincott wrote:
>> >On Tue, Aug 26, 2025 at 9:04 AM David Aguilar <davvid@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> The "cargo build" invocations in contrib/ cannot be run in parallel.
>> >>
>> >> "make -JN" with INCLUDE_LIBGIT_RS enabled causes cargo lock
>> >> warnings and can trigger ld errors during the build.
>> >>
>> >> The build errors are caused by two inner "make" invocations getting
>> >> triggered concurrently: once inside of libgit-sys and another
>> >> inside of libgit-rs.
>> >>
>> >> Signed-off-by: David Aguilar <davvid@gmail.com>
>> >> ---
>> >>  Makefile | 2 +-
>> >>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>> >>
>> >> diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
>> >> index 29a53520fd..286d3ba3b2 100644
>> >> --- a/Makefile
>> >> +++ b/Makefile
>> >> @@ -3989,7 +3989,7 @@ libgit-sys libgit-rs:
>> >>                 cargo build \
>> >>         )
>> >>  ifdef INCLUDE_LIBGIT_RS
>> >> -all:: libgit-sys libgit-rs
>> >> +all:: libgit-sys .WAIT libgit-rs
>> >
>> >I'm not familiar enough with make or with rust, but do we need to
>> >depend on both of these here? Wouldn't it be sufficient to say
>> >libgit-rs depends on libgit-sys, and only explicitly depend on libgit-rs in `all::`?
>>
>> Not all platforms can build libgit-rs, so inserting it into as a
>> required component is not a particularly friendly idea.
>>
>
>That's not what I was suggesting. This is already in an `ifdef`, and the line I was
>quoting was changing `all:: libgit-sys libgit-rs` to
>`all:: libgit-sys .WAIT libgit-rs`. I'm wondering if we can instead split the `libgit-sys
>libgit-rs:` from a few lines earlier into `libgit-sys:` and `libgit-rs: libgit-sys` and then
>change this all line to `all:: libgit-rs` (still behind `ifdef INCLUDE_LIBGIT_RS`).