[RFC/PATCH v11 05/13] t6030: explicitly test for bisection cleanup

From

Pranit Bauva <pranit.bauva@gmail.com>

Date

Jul 31, 2016, 09:21 UTC

Message-ID

<0102015640423ceb-e1fba6c7-4973-4b72-8ea9-fab72abe043d-000000@eu-west-1.amazonses.com>

In-Reply-To

<0102015640423c26-2060fd70-c90d-4de3-ae8c-1801ad160b1c-000000@eu-west-1.amazonses.com>

Mentored-by: Lars Schneider <larsxschneider@gmail.com>
Mentored-by: Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org>
Signed-off-by: Pranit Bauva <pranit.bauva@gmail.com>

---
I faced this problem while converting `bisect_clean_state` and the tests
where showing breakages but it wasn't clear as to where exactly are they
breaking. This will patch  will help in that. Also I tested the test
coverage of the test suite before this patch and it covers this (I did
this by purposely changing names of files in git-bisect.sh and running
the test suite).
---
 t/t6030-bisect-porcelain.sh | 17 +++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)

diff --git a/t/t6030-bisect-porcelain.sh b/t/t6030-bisect-porcelain.sh
index e74662b..a17f7a6 100755
--- a/t/t6030-bisect-porcelain.sh
+++ b/t/t6030-bisect-porcelain.sh
@@ -894,4 +894,21 @@ test_expect_success 'bisect start takes options and revs in any order' '
 	test_cmp expected actual
 '
 
+test_expect_success 'git bisect reset cleans bisection state properly' '
+	git bisect reset &&
+	git bisect start &&
+	git bisect good $HASH1 &&
+	git bisect bad $HASH4 &&
+	git bisect reset &&
+	test -z "$(git for-each-ref "refs/bisect/*")" &&
+	test_path_is_missing "$GIT_DIR/BISECT_EXPECTED_REV" &&
+	test_path_is_missing "$GIT_DIR/BISECT_ANCESTORS_OK" &&
+	test_path_is_missing "$GIT_DIR/BISECT_LOG" &&
+	test_path_is_missing "$GIT_DIR/BISECT_RUN" &&
+	test_path_is_missing "$GIT_DIR/BISECT_TERMS" &&
+	test_path_is_missing "$GIT_DIR/head-name" &&
+	test_path_is_missing "$GIT_DIR/BISECT_HEAD" &&
+	test_path_is_missing "$GIT_DIR/BISECT_START"
+'
+
 test_done

--
https://github.com/git/git/pull/281