RE: [PATCH v2 0/3] C99: declare bool experiment a success

>On Tue, Jul 15, 2025 at 11:23 AM <rsbecker@nexbridge.com> wrote:
>>
>> On July 15, 2025 1:19 PM Elijah Newren wrote:
>> >On Tue, Jul 15, 2025 at 6:53 AM Phillip Wood
>> ><phillip.wood123@gmail.com>
>> >wrote:
>> >>
>> >> From: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
>> >>
>> >> We've had a test balloon for C99's bool type since 8277dbe987
>> >> (git-compat-util: convert skip_{prefix,suffix}{,_mem} to bool,
>> >> 2023-12-16). As it has been over 18 months since this was added and
>> >> there have been no complaints let's declare it a success and
>> >> convert the return type our other string predicates to match.
>> >>
>[...]
>>
>> bool is not standard in all c99 implementations. I have to #include
>> <stdbool.h> in order to use this type. Please make sure there is a mechanism for
>that.
>
>>From the referenced commit in the commit message:
>
>$ git log --oneline -1 -p 8277dbe987 | head -n 13
>8277dbe9872 git-compat-util: convert skip_{prefix,suffix}{,_mem} to bool diff --git
>a/git-compat-util.h b/git-compat-util.h index 3e7a59b5ff1..603c97e3b3f 100644
>--- a/git-compat-util.h
>+++ b/git-compat-util.h
>@@ -225,6 +225,7 @@ struct strbuf;
> #include <stddef.h>
> #include <stdlib.h>
> #include <stdarg.h>
>+#include <stdbool.h>
> #include <string.h>
> #ifdef HAVE_STRINGS_H
> #include <strings.h> /* for strcasecmp() */
>
>
>So, there's not only a mechanism for that, it has already been done for you 1.5
>years ago.  No extra work on your or anyone else's part needed.  :-)