Re: [PATCH 0/3] Strengthen fsck checks for submodule URLs
Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:
Show 9 quoted lines
> ... I'm a little skeptical
> about its security value at this point (especially because hardly
> anybody runs it locally, and protection on the hosting sites isn't that
> hard to work around).
>
> So if it's causing people real pain in practice, I think there could be
> an argument for downgrading the check to a warning. I don't have a
> strong feeling that we _should_ do that, only that I don't personally
> reject it immediately as an option.
Oh, I see. I do not think I have strong objection, either.
Thanks.
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>