Re: [PATCH 0/3] doc: replay: improvements like "mention no output on conflicts"
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Dec 9, 2025, 22:57 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqqzf7ri7q7.fsf@gitster.g>
- In-Reply-To
- <202f7015-1e7f-493e-bd82-474e5cefdf01@app.fastmail.com>
"Kristoffer Haugsbakk" <code@khaugsbakk.name> writes:
Show 11 quoted lines
> On Mon, Dec 8, 2025, at 17:00, Phillip Wood wrote: > ... >> Maybe something like >> >> Update all branches whose head commits are replayed. Requires >> --onto. > > Thanks for the suggestion, and nice catch with the `--onto`. Very > personally I don’t like involving “head” terminology. Both because of > personal biases[1] as well as introducing “head” as a noun in the doc > (now it just talks about `refs/heads/`).
Yeah, I do not recall calling commit at the tip of a branch a "head commit".