Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] doc: replay: improvements like "mention no output on conflicts"

From: Kristoffer Haugsbakk <kristofferhaugsbakk@fastmail.com>
Date: Dec 15, 2025, 11:59 UTC
Message-ID: <bf3f3633-5d0d-4fa4-9706-d99e32a3f91d@app.fastmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <8fa21ce8-1e02-419f-b82a-0e4a41f7e2d8@gmail.com>

On Mon, Dec 15, 2025, at 11:13, Phillip Wood wrote:

Show 15 quoted lines

> On 13/12/2025 13:46, kristofferhaugsbakk@fastmail.com wrote:
>> From: Kristoffer Haugsbakk <code@khaugsbakk.name>
>>
>> Explicitly say that conflicts do not give any output. I found this a bit
>> confusing with the current doc since I am used to other commands
>> complaining loudly.
>>
>> § Changes in v2
>>
>> Patch 2/3: improve `--contained` and mention that it requires `--onto`.
>
> The new text looks good, I don't really understand the commit message
> but the intent of the change is clear enough.
>
> Thanks for improving the documentation

Thank you. But I’m not glad that the commit message is not clear. I would need some guidance on how to write it because it seems clear to me. Something with my brain state I guess.