From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2025 22:57:36 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] doc: replay: improvements like "mention no output on conflicts"
Message-ID: <xmqqzf7ri7q7.fsf@gitster.g>
In-Reply-To: <202f7015-1e7f-493e-bd82-474e5cefdf01@app.fastmail.com>

"Kristoffer Haugsbakk" <code@khaugsbakk.name> writes:

> On Mon, Dec 8, 2025, at 17:00, Phillip Wood wrote:
> ...
>> Maybe something like
>>
>>      Update all branches whose head commits are replayed. Requires
>>      --onto.
>
> Thanks for the suggestion, and nice catch with the `--onto`. Very
> personally I don’t like involving “head” terminology. Both because of
> personal biases[1] as well as introducing “head” as a noun in the doc
> (now it just talks about `refs/heads/`).

Yeah, I do not recall calling commit at the tip of a branch a "head
commit".