Re: [PATCH 0/3] repo: extend info path reporting and structure statistics

From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: Feb 22, 2026, 22:37 UTC
Message-ID: <xmqqzf50pfpv.fsf@gitster.g>
In-Reply-To: <pull.2208.git.git.1771784936.gitgitgadget@gmail.com>

"eslam reda via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com> writes:

Show 6 quoted lines

> Eslam reda ragheb (2):
>   t1900,t1901: make repo tests hash-agnostic and wc-portable
>   t1900,t1901: fix test portability issues
>
> eslam-reda-div (1):
>   repo: extend info paths and structure statistics

I do not think you meant to send a patch seriees with these two same but different looking folks claiming authorship.

I'll let the main change 1/3 reviewed and commented on those who are more invested into "git repo", but both [2/3] and [3/3] need to sell themselves with a more meaningful proposed log messages.

I think the test updates in [2/3] are all good things to do---they make the test more robust against changes in the hash algorithm used, what the history left by the previous test steps exactly have, etc., by avoiding hardcoded constants in the expectation. And in light of that, I do not think [3/3] is a good change, especially without explanation of why we may want to use hardcoded numbres.

Thanks.