Re: [PATCH 6/8] receive-pack.c: add a receive.preferatomicpush configuration variable
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Oct 30, 2014, 22:03 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqqy4rxtdu5.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <CAL=YDWmNXpe=0UxbHD-5pwNW-hdp=Ja1Xy8gXAKcbSkoJhpgRw@mail.gmail.com>
Ronnie Sahlberg <sahlberg@google.com> writes:
> At some stage it may becomes too many preferences and over-engineered. > Maybe I should drop this patch and then just require the plain "if you > want a push to be atomic, then use --atomic-push. end." and we have > simple and easy to understand semantics.
As I still do not quite understand why you find that this could be a "convenience preference" on the server operator's end, that would be my preference, at least until I am convinced why this could be a good idea.
Thanks.