Re: [PATCH 6/8] receive-pack.c: add a receive.preferatomicpush configuration variable
- From
Ronnie Sahlberg <sahlberg@google.com>
- Date
- Oct 30, 2014, 22:26 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CAL=YDWms5geok1j8tQUjHaOVTSG-_zbTob_AVX0GS8cA0rwaSQ@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <xmqqy4rxtdu5.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com>
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 3:03 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
Show 14 quoted lines
> Ronnie Sahlberg <sahlberg@google.com> writes: > >> At some stage it may becomes too many preferences and over-engineered. >> Maybe I should drop this patch and then just require the plain "if you >> want a push to be atomic, then use --atomic-push. end." and we have >> simple and easy to understand semantics. > > As I still do not quite understand why you find that this could be a > "convenience preference" on the server operator's end, that would be > my preference, at least until I am convinced why this could be a > good idea. > > Thanks. >
Ok, I dropped this patch.
Thanks Ronnie Sahlberg