From: Junio C Hamano Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2014 22:03:30 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/8] receive-pack.c: add a receive.preferatomicpush configuration variable Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Ronnie Sahlberg writes: > At some stage it may becomes too many preferences and over-engineered. > Maybe I should drop this patch and then just require the plain "if you > want a push to be atomic, then use --atomic-push. end." and we have > simple and easy to understand semantics. As I still do not quite understand why you find that this could be a "convenience preference" on the server operator's end, that would be my preference, at least until I am convinced why this could be a good idea. Thanks.