Re: [PATCH v4 5/8] git-rebase, sequencer: extend --quiet option for the interactive machinery
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Jan 22, 2019, 20:39 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqqy37ce8ad.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <CABPp-BFrgjW-c8NKGYKs1VaH--Oc8yUu0enQMSp1pQVUwBOBwA@mail.gmail.com>
Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> writes:
Show 9 quoted lines
> Also, I have a fuzzy memory of discussing a very similar case with > some rebase-oriented option and its on-disk representation, where the > concern was more about users upgrading git versions during an > incomplete rebase rather than power users looking at internal file > contents. And I think either Phillip or Junio made some statement > about considering these internal details and that they felt the worry > about upgrade mid-rebase was overly worrying. But I can't find the > emails right now, and it's been so long (at least half a year) that I > might be imagining things.
I do recall saying that mid-rebase upgrade is probably not worth getting worried about.