Re: [PATCH v4 0/8] Reimplement rebase --merge via interactive machinery
- From
Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
- Date
- Jan 21, 2019, 21:02 UTC
- Message-ID
- <nycvar.QRO.7.76.6.1901212201360.41@tvgsbejvaqbjf.bet>
- In-Reply-To
- <xmqqtvi5irv9.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com>
Hi Junio,
On Fri, 18 Jan 2019, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 17 quoted lines
> Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> writes: > > > On Fri, 18 Jan 2019, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > > >> Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> writes: > >> > >> > I am about to submit a new iteration of my patch series, would it > >> > be too much trouble for you to rebase on top? If it would be, let > >> > me know, then I will rebase on top of yours. > >> > >> Or both of you keep the topics as-is and self-consistent, and let the > >> rerere machinery to squash it in when the two topics gets merged. > > > > With all the experience I have with rerere, I don't trust it. > > FWIW, I trust it once I got right resolution better than randomly > rebased resubmission that needs to be re-reviewed afresh.
Once again, our experiences teach us diametrically opposed things. I definitely trust my rebased version more than your rerere-affected resolution.
Ciao, Dscho