Re: [PATCH v4 0/8] Reimplement rebase --merge via interactive machinery
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Jan 18, 2019, 21:21 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqqtvi5irv9.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <nycvar.QRO.7.76.6.1901182203350.41@tvgsbejvaqbjf.bet>
Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> writes:
Show 15 quoted lines
> Hi Junio, > > On Fri, 18 Jan 2019, Junio C Hamano wrote: > >> Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> writes: >> >> > I am about to submit a new iteration of my patch series, would it be too >> > much trouble for you to rebase on top? If it would be, let me know, then I >> > will rebase on top of yours. >> >> Or both of you keep the topics as-is and self-consistent, and let >> the rerere machinery to squash it in when the two topics gets >> merged. > > With all the experience I have with rerere, I don't trust it.
FWIW, I trust it once I got right resolution better than randomly rebased resubmission that needs to be re-reviewed afresh.