Re: [PATCH 1/3] gpg-interface.c: use flags to determine key/signer info presence
"brian m. carlson" <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net> writes:
Show 9 quoted lines
> On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 06:38:19PM +0200, Michał Górny wrote:
>> Replace the logic used to determine whether key and signer information
>> is present to use explicit flags in sigcheck_gpg_status[] array. This
>> is more future-proof, since it makes it possible to add additional
>> statuses without having to explicitly update the conditions.
>
> This series looks good to me. I was going to ask after patch 2 whether
> you were printing the subkey or primary key fingerprint, and then you
> answered my question in patch 3. Thanks for including both.
Yeah, this looks good to me too. Thanks, both.